You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 22, December 14, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Revascularization
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Routine vs Selective Invasive Strategies in Acute Coronary Syndromes

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: The meta-analysis by Dr Mehta and colleagues1 suggested a beneficial effect from a routine invasive coronary strategy compared with a selective invasive strategy in patients with NSTE ACS over a follow-up of about one and one-half years. The accompanying Editorial2 discussed the need to consider coronary angiography in patients with NSTE ACS.

The meta-analysis was based on 7 articles. The conclusion was that compared with a selective invasive approach, a routine invasive approach did not improve overall mortality but did improve rates of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and the combined outcomes of death and nonfatal MI. This effect was seen most strongly in 2 studies, FRISC II3 and VINO.4 These findings are similar to those of another meta-analysis of the same 7 studies.5

However, there were several design limitations in the individual trials that deserve further consideration before a routine invasive approach is embraced in patients with . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Enrique V. Carbajal, MD
enrique.carbajal@va.gov
Veterans Affairs Central California Health Care System
Fresno, Calif


RELATED ARTICLES

Routine vs Selective Invasive Strategies in Acute Coronary Syndromes
Anthony A. Bavry and Dharam J. Kumbhani
JAMA. 2005;294(22):2844-2845.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Routine vs Selective Invasive Strategies in Acute Coronary Syndromes—Reply
Shamir R. Mehta and Salim Yusuf
JAMA. 2005;294(22):2845-2846.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Routine vs Selective Invasive Strategies in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Collaborative Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
Shamir R. Mehta, Christopher P. Cannon, Keith A. A. Fox, Lars Wallentin, William E. Boden, Rudolf Spacek, Petr Widimsky, Peter A. McCullough, David Hunt, Eugene Braunwald, and Salim Yusuf
JAMA. 2005;293(23):2908-2917.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.