You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 24, December 28, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Law and Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Technology Licensing

Lessons From the US Experience

Gregory K. Sobolski, BA, BS; John H. Barton, JD; Ezekiel J. Emanuel, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2005;294:3137-3140.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In recent years, there has been substantial focus on patenting scientific discoveries from public and private research institutions. The push for increased patenting has been driven most strongly in the United States, but has also extended to other countries.1 Although the multiple roles for technology development and transfer can yield important social benefits, some are potentially detrimental. One reason for the attention on patenting is the belief that licensing patented technologies could generate income that in turn could finance additional research and socially valuable programs. This belief has surfaced in discussions of public policy, most notably in developing countries. The assumption that technology licensing is a principal answer to unlocking a revenue goldmine is faulty and can lead to undesirable consequences. In this article, we analyze the US licensing experience longitudinally, discuss policy implications, address emerging . . . [Full Text of this Article]

The US Technology Licensing Environment

Author Affiliations: Department of Clinical Bioethics (Dr Emanuel, Messrs Sobolski and Barton), and Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute (Messrs Sobolski and Barton), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md; and Stanford University Law School, Stanford, Calif (Mr Barton).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Using Patent Data to Assess the Value of Pharmaceutical Innovation
Kesselheim and Avorn
J Law Med Ethics 2009;37:176-183.
 

Leveraging University Research to Advance Global Health
Chokshi and Rajkumar
JAMA 2007;298:1934-1936.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.