You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 3, July 20, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Life
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Pediatrics
 •Child Development
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Outcomes for Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Disappointing News

Jon E. Tyson, MD, MPH; Saroj Saigal, MD

JAMA. 2005;294:371-373.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The long-term outcome for extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants—weighing less than 1000 g at birth—is of great interest to parents, the public, and a broad variety of professional groups, including educators, psychologists, health care planners, as well as obstetricians, neonatologists, pediatricians, and all other medical specialists involved in the care of these children. Studies of small premature infants born before the 1990s indicated that intensive perinatal care decreased their mortality without decreasing the proportion of survivors with disabilities. As a result, the absolute number of the survivors with disabilities increased.1

The advances in perinatal care in the 1990s, particularly the widespread use of antenatal corticosteroids and postnatal surfactant, dramatically reduced the mortality of high-risk infants. Partly because these advances help to prevent intracranial hemorrhage and improve pulmonary function, there has been hope for a reduction in the proportion, if not the absolute number, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston Medical School, Houston (Dr Tyson); and Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario (Dr Saigal).


RELATED ARTICLE

Chronic Conditions, Functional Limitations, and Special Health Care Needs of School-aged Children Born With Extremely Low-Birth-Weight in the 1990s
Maureen Hack, H. Gerry Taylor, Dennis Drotar, Mark Schluchter, Lydia Cartar, Laura Andreias, Deanne Wilson-Costello, and Nancy Klein
JAMA. 2005;294(3):318-325.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Quality of Life of Formerly Preterm and Very Low Birth Weight Infants From Preschool Age to Adulthood: A Systematic Review
Zwicker and Harris
Pediatrics 2008;121:e366-e376.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relation between Intrauterine Growth and Subsequent Intellectual Disability in a Ten-year Population Cohort of Children in Western Australia
Leonard et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:103-111.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does Cerebellar Injury in Premature Infants Contribute to the High Prevalence of Long-term Cognitive, Learning, and Behavioral Disability in Survivors?
Limperopoulos et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:584-593.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Self-Perceived Health-Related Quality of Life of Former Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants at Young Adulthood
Saigal et al.
Pediatrics 2006;118:1140-1148.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Outcomes for Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants
Reiss
JAMA 2005;294:2168-2169.
FULL TEXT  

Neonatal Ethics at the Limits of Viability
McCullough
Pediatrics 2005;116:1019-1021.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.