This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (2)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Obesity  • Alert me on articles by topic

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In the study by Dr Flegal and colleagues,¹ it seems likely that their estimates of excess mortality due to overweight and obesity would have been substantially higher, and their estimates of excess mortality due to underweight would have been substantially lower, if they had accounted for 2 confounders that they did not address. The first is caused by elderly persons tending to lose weight prior to death.² The second is caused by potential regression-to-the-mean patterns in the BMI data.^2-3 Corrections for these confounders can be made with longitudinal data on body weight, which are available in the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study (NHEFS) database. This approach was used successfully by the Prospective Studies Collaboration to adjust for confounders in order to estimate mortality associated with different levels of blood pressure.³ It would be valuable if Flegal et al could use the NHEFS data to apply these corrections . . . [Full Text of this Article]

James Greenberg, PhD
jamesg@brooklyn.cuny.edu
Department of Health and Nutrition Sciences
Brooklyn College of the City University of New York
Brooklyn

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The effectiveness of screening for obesity in primary care: weighing the evidence.
Wilson and McAlpine
Med Care Res Rev 2006;63:570-598.
ABSTRACT