This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (24)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letters  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Medical Practice  • Health Policy  • Medical Ethics  • Genetics  • Genetic Counseling/ Testing/ Therapy  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Implications of Respect for Participants

David I. Shalowitz, AB; Franklin G. Miller, PhD

JAMA. 2005;294:737-740.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Controversy exists about the responsibility of investigators to communicate the results of research to study participants. These research results may be categorized as either general study results, which represent aggregate data usually published by the research team, or individual results, which are research findings relevant to particular participants. Disclosure of individual research results has become particularly contentious in the context of genetics research, for which genotypes of individual participants often become known to investigators.¹ However, disclosure of individual results should be addressed in all research involving human participants.

When aggregate results of research correlate with aspects of the health and well-being of participants, disclosing individual results has the potential to significantly affect the lives of participants. Accordingly, investigators and institutional review boards (IRBs) should consider when and how participants should be informed of individual research results. This article reviews previously articulated policies . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Existing Standards

Author Affiliations: Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Implications of Disclosing Individual Results of Clinical Research
Ellen Wright Clayton and Lainie Friedman Ross
JAMA. 2006;295(1):37.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Implications of Disclosing Individual Results of Clinical Research—Reply
David I. Shalowitz and Franklin G. Miller
JAMA. 2006;295(1):37-38.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

From Genetics to Genomics: Ethics, Policy, and Parental Decision-making
Wilfond and Ross
J Pediatr Psychol 2009;34:639-647.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Disclosure of Research Results from Cancer Genomic Studies: State of the Science
Dressler
Clin. Cancer Res. 2009;15:4270-4276.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Subjects' views of obligations to ensure post-trial access to drugs, care and information: qualitative results from the Experiences of Participants in Clinical Trials (EPIC) study
Sofaer et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2009;35:183-188.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The high incidence and bioethics of findings on magnetic resonance brain imaging of normal volunteers for neuroscience research
Hoggard et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2009;35:194-199.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Providing Research Results to Participants: Attitudes and Needs of Adolescents and Parents of Children With Cancer
Fernandez et al.
JCO 2009;27:878-883.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Communicating Clinical Trial Results to Research Participants
Dorsey et al.
Arch Neurol 2008;65:1590-1595.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethical, legal, and social considerations in conducting the Human Microbiome Project
McGuire et al.
Genome Res 2008;18:1861-1864.
FULL TEXT  

The search for clarity in communicating research results to study participants
Shalowitz and Miller
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:e17-e17.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Incidental findings in human subjects research: what do investigators owe research participants?
Miller et al.
J Law Med Ethics 2008;36:271-279.
 

Incidental findings in genetics research using archived DNA.
Clayton
J Law Med Ethics 2008;36:286-291.
 

Genomic research and incidental findings.
Van Ness
J Law Med Ethics 2008;36:292-297.
 

Incidental findings in pediatric research.
Wilfond and Carpenter
J Law Med Ethics 2008;36:332-340.
 

Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants
Miller et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:210-213.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patients need not give consent in all clinical education.
Dinnett et al.
BMJ 2006;332:549-549.
FULL TEXT  

Offering results to research participants
MacNeil and Fernandez
BMJ 2006;332:188-189.
FULL TEXT  

Implications of Disclosing Individual Results of Clinical Research
Clayton and Ross
JAMA 2006;295:37-37.
FULL TEXT