This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care  • End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Researchers have used various methods to identify cause of death for case-mix classification at the end of life, but there has been no systematic evaluation of the consistency between these methods. The most common approach is to use the death certificate underlying cause of death, but the limitations of this method include problematic data quality,¹ prohibitive cost of obtaining National Death Index data, and identification of the underlying cause of death (the condition that started the train of fatal events) may not be consistent with a particular research objective. Some researchers have used health care utilization data from their study data sets to identify cause of death for case-mix classification. The methods have included identifying the last major diagnosis (last-diagnosis method)^2-3 and using the diagnosis responsible for the most resource use near death (cost method).^4-5 We assessed the consistency among death certificate data and these 2 other . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Methods

Samuel S. Richardson, BA
samuel.richardson3@med.va.gov

Wei Yu, PhD
Health Economics Resource Center of Health Services Research and Development Service
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Menlo Park, Calif

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?