You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 7, August 17, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Health Policy
 •Law and Medicine
 •Pain
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Medical Marijuana, American Federalism, and the Supreme Court

Lawrence O. Gostin, JD, LLD (Hon)

JAMA. 2005;294:842-844.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Gonzalez v Raich, the US Supreme Court held that federal law enforcement authorities could criminally prosecute patients for possessing marijuana prescribed by a physician in accordance with state law.1 The Court did not overturn state medical marijuana laws but did open the door to criminal prosecution under federal drug statutes. The Court also did not foreclose future challenges to federal enforcement on other constitutional grounds (eg, an unwarranted invasion of patient-physician privacy).

Explaining the significance of Raich requires examination of 2 issues. The first concerns American federalism and raises an important constitutional principle about the appropriate scope of federal public health powers. The second issue concerns the use of marijuana as a medical treatment and raises intriguing questions about the practice of medicine and the patient-physician relationship. In Raich, the Supreme Court pointedly questioned the wisdom of prosecuting patients: "The case . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Gonzalez v Raich

Author Affiliation: Georgetown Law Center, Washington, DC.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Regulation of Medical Marijuana
Rajiv Das
JAMA. 2005;294(24):3091.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Regulation of Medical Marijuana—Reply
Lawrence O. Gostin
JAMA. 2005;294(24):3091-3092.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Legal Status of Medical Marijuana
Seamon
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2006;40:2211-2215.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician-assisted suicide: a legitimate medical practice?
Gostin
JAMA 2006;295:1941-1943.
FULL TEXT  

Regulation of Medical Marijuana
Das
JAMA 2005;294:3091-3091.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.