 |
 |

Varicella Vaccine, Cost-effectiveness Analyses, and Vaccination Policy
Matthew M. Davis, MD, MAPP
JAMA. 2005;294:845-846.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Has varicella vaccination been as cost-effective as anticipated when it was universally recommended for children 10 years ago? The answer is complicated and illuminates an evolving controversy regarding the role of cost-effectiveness analyses in deliberations over national vaccine recommendations.
In 1994, Lieu and colleagues1 estimated the cost-effectiveness of a universal childhood varicella vaccination program. Projecting a national vaccination rate of 97% by the sixth year of the program, they estimated a 94% reduction in varicella incidence, accompanied by an 89% reduction in direct medical costs. Accounting as well for reductions in the quantity of parents and other adults lost work time attributable to varicella (ie, the "indirect" benefits of vaccination), Lieu et al projected that a varicella vaccination program would save more than $5 for every $1 spent.1
These projections of reduced varicella disease burden and direct medical costs with varicella vaccination appear prescient, even . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Author Affiliations: Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, Division of General Pediatrics, Division of General Internal Medicine, and the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Impact of Varicella Vaccination on Health Care Utilization
Fangjun Zhou, Rafael Harpaz, Aisha O. Jumaan, Carla A. Winston, and Abigail Shefer
JAMA. 2005;294(7):797-802.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
A Decade of Varicella Vaccine Has Made a Difference
JWatch Emergency Med. 2005;2005:3-3.
FULL TEXT
Vaccine Has Markedly Reduced Varicella-Associated Healthcare Utilization
JWatch Infect. Diseases 2005;2005:4-4.
FULL TEXT
|