You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 9, September 7, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  A Piece of My Mind
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Humanities
 •Humanities, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

"The Medical Humanities," for Lack of a Better Term

Rafael Campo, MA, MD, DLitt(Hon)
Boston, Mass
rcampo@bidmc.harvard.edu

JAMA. 2005;294:1009-1011.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Recently, I returned from addressing a conference in London, one that had been convened to discuss issues relevant to what was called somewhat vaguely "the medical humanities." Among the few hundred attendees were poets, physicians, filmmakers, nurses, sociologists, literary theorists, art therapists, ethicists, photographers, medical students, hospice workers, historians, representatives of public and private grant-making organizations, musicians, philosophers, occupational and physical therapists, dancers, and patients—many of whom, like me, owing allegiance to more than one such group. The gathering was also both international and multicultural, with Americans and Britons of various roots (Indian and Latino, Nigerian and Scottish) mixing with their Chinese, German, Cuban, Scandinavian, and Australian counterparts. The greatest paradox of the meeting, however, soon became apparent: here we were, scientists and artists from across the globe, all deeply concerned about the growing dehumanization of medical care, yet quite unsure about under which inspiring . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

The Medical Humanities and Medical Education
Howard Spiro
JAMA. 2006;295(9):997.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Medical Humanities and Medical Education
Michael A. Bogdasarian
JAMA. 2006;295(9):997.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Medical Humanities and Medical Education—Reply
Rafael Campo
JAMA. 2006;295(9):997-998.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Medical humanities: demarcations, dilemmas and delights
Shafer
Med. Humanities 2009;35:3-4.
FULL TEXT  

A silly expression: Consultants' implicit and explicit understanding of Medical Humanities. A qualitative analysis
Knight
Med. Humanities 2006;32:119-124.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Medical Humanities and Medical Education
Spiro
JAMA 2006;295:997-997.
FULL TEXT  

The Medical Humanities and Medical Education
Bogdasarian
JAMA 2006;295:997-997.
FULL TEXT  

Medical Education 2005: From Allegory to Bull Moose
Golub
JAMA 2005;294:1108-1110.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.