You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 9, September 7, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Academic Medical Centers
 •Medical Education
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Separate and Equitable Promotion Tracks for Clinician-Educators

Victoria Manion Fleming, PhD; Nancy Schindler, MD; Gary J. Martin, MD; Debra A. DaRosa, PhD

JAMA. 2005;294:1101-1104.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Most academic medical centers (AMCs) have missions that aim for excellence in 3 areas: education, research, and patient care. For decades, "triple-threat" faculty members were able to substantively contribute to all 3. However, heightened competition for research grants, changes in the health care delivery system, more sophisticated instructional and evaluation methods, and increased requirements to account for time and productivity make it less feasible for individual faculty to significantly contribute to all 3. Instead, faculty members are likely to focus their efforts in 1 or 2 of these areas. Although exceptions exist, physician faculty members focus either on patient care and research or on patient care and education.

The problem is that promotion and tenure systems work well for faculty members pursuing the former but not as well for those focusing on the latter.1-4 For . . . [Full Text of this Article]

History of Faculty Tracks

Author Affiliations: Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinicians in Quality Improvement: A New Career Pathway in Academic Medicine
Shojania and Levinson
JAMA 2009;301:766-768.
FULL TEXT  

Nurturing Passion in a Time of Academic Climate Change: The Modern-Day Challenge of Junior Faculty Development
Chapman and Guay-Woodford
CJASN 2008;3:1878-1883.
FULL TEXT  

Shaping Your Career to Maximize Personal Satisfaction in the Practice of Oncology
Shanafelt et al.
JCO 2006;24:4020-4026.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Redesigning residency education in internal medicine: a position paper from the association of program directors in internal medicine.
Fitzgibbons et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;144:920-926.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical Education 2005: From Allegory to Bull Moose
Golub
JAMA 2005;294:1108-1110.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.