You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 295 No. 1, January 4, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Ethics
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Implications of Disclosing Individual Results of Clinical Research—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Drs Clayton and Ross claim that our recommendations conflate the purposes of clinical care and research and, thus, promote the therapeutic misconception. We agree that it is important to consider research and therapy as separate and distinct activities.1-2 However, our position does not conflate research and therapy. Such an effect is more likely a result of the current ethics guidelines, which limit disclosure to results judged by health care professionals to have clinical utility.

The heart of the controversy surrounding disclosure of individual research results concerns the most appropriate manner of expressing respect for participants: limiting disclosure to those results that have established clinical utility vs recognizing a presumption that results should be made available to participants on request.

Respect for persons underlies the basic principles of research ethics, including the requirements to minimize research-related risks and obtain informed consent. Although these requirements are important, focusing exclusively on . . . [Full Text of this Article]

David I. Shalowitz, AB; Franklin G. Miller, PhD
fmiller@nih.gov
Department of Clinical Bioethics
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, Md



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Implications of Disclosing Individual Results of Clinical Research
Ellen Wright Clayton and Lainie Friedman Ross
JAMA. 2006;295(1):37.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Disclosing Individual Results of Clinical Research: Implications of Respect for Participants
David I. Shalowitz and Franklin G. Miller
JAMA. 2005;294(6):737-740.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The search for clarity in communicating research results to study participants
Shalowitz and Miller
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:e17-e17.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.