This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Complementary and Alternative Medicine  • Pain  • Randomized Controlled Trial  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Tracy Hampton, PhD

JAMA. 2006;295:1111.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Not all placebos are equivalent in their effects, scientists have discovered from a study of sham acupuncture vs an oral inert pill to treat pain. The research is the first to investigate how the placebo effect varies in specific clinical environments (Kaptchuk TJ et al. BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.38726.603310.55 [published online ahead of print February 2, 2006]).

The study of 270 individuals with chronic arm pain due to repetitive use included two phases. First, half of the patients were given sham acupuncture and half were given a placebo pill for 2 weeks. Pain decreased to a similar extent in both groups. Next, participants were randomized to continue their placebo treatment or to begin active treatment of the same type: half of the patients were randomized to sham vs real acupuncture twice a week for 4 weeks, and half were randomized to placebo pill vs amitriptyline once daily for . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?