You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 295 No. 10, March 8, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Author in the Room Audio
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (42)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic

All-or-None Measurement Raises the Bar on Performance

Thomas Nolan, PhD; Donald M. Berwick, MD, MPP

JAMA. 2006;295:1168-1170.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The pursuit of evidence-based medicine is now at the core of the agenda for improving health care in the United States. All major quality measurement systems use science-based indicators of proper processes of care, such as the ORYX measures of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations,1 the Health Employer Data and Information Sets measures of the National Committee on Quality Assurance,2 the measures used by the Quality Improvement Organizations under contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,3 and at least 70 of the 179 measures in the 2004 National Health Care Quality Report from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.4

Often, several individual performance measures are used to assess care of the same condition. For example, a recent summary of data on the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations' standardized performance measures included 9 measures for . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Option 1: Item-by-Item Measurement

Advantages of All-or-None Measurement

Issues and Opportunities With All-or-None Measurement

Author Affiliations: Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, Mass.


RELATED LETTERS

All-or-none measurement of health care quality.

JAMA. ;296():392-392.
FULL TEXT  

All-or-none measurement of health care quality.

JAMA. ;296():392-393.
FULL TEXT  

All-or-None Measurement of Health Care Quality--Reply
and
JAMA. ;296():393-393.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Some Old and Some New Statistical Tools for Outcomes Research
Normand
Circulation 2008;118:872-884.
FULL TEXT  

Hospital Quality Performance Report: An Application of Composite Scoring
Fong et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2008;23:287-295.
ABSTRACT  

Public Reporting of Antibiotic Timing in Patients with Pneumonia: Lessons from a Flawed Performance Measure
Wachter et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:29-32.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship of a Quality Measure Composite to Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Heart Failure
Chung et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2008;23:168-175.
ABSTRACT  

Discriminating Quality of Hospital Care in the United States
Normand et al.
Med Decis Making 2008;28:308-322.
ABSTRACT  

Measuring and Improving the Quality of Care for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery
Dimick and Upchurch
Circulation 2008;117:2534-2541.
FULL TEXT  

Hospital Treatment of Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Using the "Get With The Guidelines" Program
LaBresh et al.
Arch Intern Med 2008;168:411-417.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Exploring the Behavior of Hospital Composite Performance Measures: An Example From Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
O'Brien et al.
Circulation 2007;116:2969-2975.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Defining a high performance healthcare organisation
Agins and Holden
BMJ 2007;335:1055-1056.
FULL TEXT  

Crossing the Quality Chasm for Diabetes Care: The Power of One Physician, His Team, and Systems Thinking
Solberg et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20:299-306.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Performance improvement based on integrated quality management models: what evidence do we have? A systematic literature review
Minkman et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:90-104.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality Measurement in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Part 1--Conceptual Framework and Measure Selection
Shahian et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007;83:S3-S12.
FULL TEXT  

Quality Measurement in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Part 2--Statistical Considerations in Composite Measure Scoring and Provider Rating
O'Brien et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007;83:S13-S26.
FULL TEXT  

All or none measurement: why we know so little about the comprehensiveness of care
Kelley
Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:1-3.
FULL TEXT  

Public Reporting and Pay for Performance in Hospital Quality Improvement
Lindenauer et al.
NEJM 2007;356:486-496.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving the quality of care for coronary artery disease
LaCivita
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:35-35.
FULL TEXT  

Relationship Between Medicare's Hospital Compare Performance Measures and Mortality Rates
Werner and Bradlow
JAMA 2006;296:2694-2702.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

All-or-none measurement of health care quality.
Van Matre
JAMA 2006;296:392-392.
FULL TEXT  

All-or-none measurement of health care quality.
Chelmowski
JAMA 2006;296:392-393.
FULL TEXT  

Expected and Unanticipated Consequences of the Quality and Information Technology Revolutions
Wachter
JAMA 2006;295:2780-2783.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.