 |
|
Thank You, JAMA Peer Reviewers and Authors
Catherine D. DeAngelis, MD, MPH;
Phil B. Fontanarosa, MD, MBA
JAMA. 2006;295:1171-1172.
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
In this issue of JAMA, we are publishing the names of the 3537 peer reviewers who completed manuscript reviews for JAMA in 2005.1 We extend our sincere thanks to these dedicated reviewers, who represent virtually every discipline in biomedical science and nearly 40 countries, for their rigorous critiques and thoughtful recommendations in helping to ensure the scientific quality of articles published in JAMA.
We also appreciate the efforts of these reviewers in alerting us about ethical issues involving some submitted papers, such as several instances of duplicate submission, duplicate publication, plagiarism, and concerns about research or data integrity. Identification of these concerns is an indispensable aspect of the peer review process and is essential to maintain the scientific integrity and highest ethical standards for articles published in JAMA. We take pride in having the most stringent requirements . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Author Affiliations: Dr DeAngelis is Editor-in-Chief and Dr Fontanarosa is Executive Deputy Editor, JAMA.
RELATED ARTICLE
JAMA Peer Reviewers in 2005
JAMA. 2006;295(10):1175-1188.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Response to Dr Gotzche and Dr Bjarnason
Bingham
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:1624-1625.
FULL TEXT
COX-2 inhibitor
Gotzsche and Bjarnason
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:1623-1624.
FULL TEXT
|
