This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (14)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Statistics and Research Methods  • Randomized Controlled Trial  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Peter C. Gøtzsche, MD, DrMedSci

JAMA. 2006;295:1172-1174.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The design of the classic, parallel-group randomized trial involves formulating a null hypothesis of no difference between 2 interventions and identifying a clinically relevant difference () that researchers do not wish to overlook. Commonly referred to as superiority trials, the investigators usually hope to be able to reject the null hypothesis and demonstrate a difference between interventions. In contrast, a noninferiority trial is one-sided in nature¹ as it seeks to determine whether a new intervention is no worse than a reference intervention within a prespecified noninferiority interval (– to 0) for the primary outcome. Similarly, an equivalence trial aims to determine whether 2 interventions have a similar effect, within a prespecified interval (– to + ).

Noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials create challenges for researchers and clinicians and are associated with several issues that are controversial and difficult to grasp, even for trialists. Two reports . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Quality of Reporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized Trials
Anne Le Henanff, Bruno Giraudeau, Gabriel Baron, and Philippe Ravaud
JAMA. 2006;295(10):1147-1151.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement
Gilda Piaggio, Diana R. Elbourne, Douglas G. Altman, Stuart J. Pocock, Stephen J. W. Evans, and for the CONSORT Group
JAMA. 2006;295(10):1152-1160.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Evaluating the Evidence: Is There a Rigid Hierarchy?
Ho et al.
Circulation 2008;118:1675-1684.
FULL TEXT  

Effects of age, gender, obesity, and diabetes on the efficacy and safety of the selective A2A agonist regadenoson versus adenosine in myocardial perfusion imaging integrated ADVANCE-MPI trial results.
Cerqueira et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2008;1:307-316.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Non-Inferiority Trials in Surgical Oncology
Fueglistaler et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:1532-1539.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Good Enough: A Primer on the Analysis and Interpretation of Noninferiority Trials
Kaul and Diamond
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:62-69.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT