 |
 |

Prevention of Cervical Cancer in Low-Resource Settings
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Dr Denny and colleagues1 studied screen-and-treat approaches to cervical cancer screening in low-resource settings. We question whether these approaches should be characterized as safe, effective, or resource-appropriate in a real-world setting.
Supply, equipment, salary, space, and overhead costs for Papanicolaou tests in developing countries such as Vietnam total less than $0.50 per test.2 Supply costs alone for the human papillomavirus (HPV) test total $20 to $30 per test2; when analyzed in developing-country laboratories there is difficulty with reproducibility and accuracy that is comparable to cytology.3
Denny et al used colposcopic biopsies to evaluate the possibility of invasive carcinoma among women in their study. However, in real-world settings screen-and-treat would require performing cryosurgery without biopsy on screen-positive women. Under a screen-and-treat approach, considerable proportions of women screened would be informed that they have a positive screening result for cervical cancer; cryosurgery may render it impossible to determine . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Eric J. Suba, MD
eric.suba@kp.org Kaiser Permanente Medical Center South San Francisco, Calif
Kim R. Geisinger, MD
Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center Winston-Salem, NC
Matthew A. Zarka, MD
Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Ariz
Stephen S. Raab, MD
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh, Pa
RELATED ARTICLES
Prevention of Cervical Cancer in Low-Resource Settings
Imre Boncz
JAMA. 2006;295(11):1248.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Prevention of Cervical Cancer in Low-Resource SettingsReply
Thomas C. Wright, Jr, Louise Kuhn, and Lynette Denny
JAMA. 2006;295(11):1249.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Screen-and-Treat Approaches for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Low-Resource Settings: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Lynette Denny, Louise Kuhn, Michelle De Souza, Amy E. Pollack, William Dupree, and Thomas C. Wright, Jr
JAMA. 2005;294(17):2173-2181.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|