This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Tobacco  • Health Policy  • Law and Medicine  • Alert me on articles by topic

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In his Commentary, Dr Gostin¹ hardly does justice to the Rehnquist Court's role in dealing with the top preventable cause of death in the United States, smoking-related disease.

More than 100 years ago, during the discussion regarding what was finally passed as the original Food and Drug Act of 1906, JAMA stated that " . . . the poisoning of the population for profit by mercenary manufacturers is in its way a much more vital question. . . . "² In 2000, by a 5 to 4 decision, the Supreme Court, in FDA v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp, denied the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) jurisdiction over cigarettes.³ Justice Stephen Breyer, who wrote the dissenting opinion, observed at the time of oral argument: "Is the statute [Federal Food, Drug, & Cosmetic Act of 1938] supposed to stop the FDA from looking at the real world?"⁴ However, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, who wrote . . . [Full Text of this Article]

James H. Lutschg, MD
glutschg@cox.net
Baton Rouge, La

RELATED ARTICLES

The Rehnquist Court and Tobacco—Reply
Lawrence O. Gostin
JAMA. 2006;295(11):1251.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Supreme Court’s Influence on Medicine and Health: The Rehnquist Court, 1986-2005
Lawrence O. Gostin
JAMA. 2005;294(13):1685-1687.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT