You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 295 No. 14, April 12, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Physiology
 •Surgical Infections
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Wound Infection

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Belda and colleagues1 found that patients receiving supplemental inspired oxygen at a fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) of 80% had a reduced risk of surgical wound infection compared with those who received oxygen at FIO2 of 30%. I have concerns regarding the method of oxygen administration that was used in these patients.

Oxygen delivery systems are generally classified as low-flow (or variable-performance) devices and high-flow (or fixed-performance) devices. Low-flow systems provide oxygen at flow rates lower than the patient's inspiratory demands; if the total minute ventilation exceeds the flow capacity of the oxygen reservoir, room air is entrained. The final FIO2 that is delivered depends not only on the ventilatory demands of the patient but also on the size of the oxygen reservoir and the rate at which the reservoir is filled. In contrast, high-flow systems provide a constant FIO2 by . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Ritesh Agarwal, MD, DM
riteshpgi@gmail.com
Department of Pulmonary Medicine
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
Chandigarh, India



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Wound Infection
Stefan Suttner, Joachim Boldt, and Swen Piper
JAMA. 2006;295(14):1641-1642.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Wound Infection
Kane O. Pryor, Cynthia A. Lien, Thomas J. Fahey, III, and Peter A. Goldstein
JAMA. 2006;295(14):1642.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Wound Infection—Reply
F. Javier Belda and Daniel I. Sessler
JAMA. 2006;295(14):1642-1643.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Supplemental Perioperative Oxygen and the Risk of Surgical Wound Infection: A Randomized Controlled Trial
F. Javier Belda, Luciano Aguilera, José García de la Asunción, Javier Alberti, Rosario Vicente, Lucía Ferrándiz, Rafael Rodríguez, Roque Company, Daniel I. Sessler, Gerardo Aguilar, Stephanie García Botello, Rafael Ortí, and for the Spanish Reduccion de la Tasa de Infeccion Quirurgica Group
JAMA. 2005;294(16):2035-2042.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The low-flow or high-flow oxygen delivery system and a low-flow or high-flow nonrebreather mask.
Agarwal
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006;174:1055a-1055a.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.