 |
 |

Relations Between Physicians and AttorneysReply
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply: The letters from Drs Kopen, Rude, and Foucar implicitly assume that the tort reforms urged by medical societies and malpractice insurers will resolve physicians' problems with the liability system. We doubt this. Caps on noneconomic damages could lower liability insurance rates (by reducing the value of settlements and judgments), but they would do nothing to diminish the sense of unfairness that many physicians associate with the medical malpractice system. This arises from what many see as that system's propensity to attach moral blame when clinical outcomes disappoint, even when physicians do their best.
Diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainty magnify this sense of unfairness. More often than not, science does not decisively answer the question of which diagnostic or therapeutic approach to take. And in the absence of decisive science, different physicians handle similar clinical scenarios in different ways, resulting in wide variations in medical practice. This leaves physicians vulnerable . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Peter D. Jacobson, JD, MPH
pdj@umich.edu Department of Health Management & Policy University of Michigan School of Public Health Ann Arbor
M. Gregg Bloche, MD, JD
The Brookings Institution Georgetown University Law Center Washington, DC
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Relations Between Physicians and Attorneys
Dan F. Kopen
JAMA. 2006;295(14):1643.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Relations Between Physicians and Attorneys
Robert E. Rude
JAMA. 2006;295(14):1643-1644.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Relations Between Physicians and Attorneys
Elliott Foucar
JAMA. 2006;295(14):1644.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Improving Relations Between Attorneys and Physicians
Peter D. Jacobson and M. Gregg Bloche
JAMA. 2005;294(16):2083-2085.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|