 |
 |

Constraints on Publication Rights in Industry-Initiated Clinical Trials
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Constraints on the publication rights of clinical investigators in industry-initiated trials have been described,1-2 but have been investigated in surveys that relied mainly on individuals' recall and attitudes and may have underestimated the extent of its occurrence. We examined directly the presence of constraints in trial protocols and subsequent publications.
Methods
For all 44 industry-initiated randomized trials that were approved in 1994-1995 by the Scientific-Ethical Committees for Copenhagen and Frederiksberg in Denmark and that resulted in publication, we compared the full trial protocols with all text in the subsequent publications (median publication year, 1999), including footnotes and acknowledgments.3 To look for changes over time as a response to new guidelines and ethical requirements, we also assessed the first 44 industry-initiated trial protocols approved in 2004 by the same committees; insufficient time had passed to assess subsequent publications.
For the 2004 protocols, committee requirements removed information that identified particular . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Peter C. Gøtzsche, MD, DrMedSci
pcg@cochrane.dk
Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, MD, PhD;
Helle Krogh Johansen, MD, DrMedSci;
Mette T. Haahr, BSc
Nordic Cochrane Centre Copenhagen, Denmark
Douglas G. Altman, DSc
Centre for Statistics in Medicine Oxford, England
An-Wen Chan, MD, DPhil
Department of Medicine University of Toronto, Ontario
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
More regulation of industry-supported biomedical research: are we asking the right questions?
Fry-Revere and Malmstrom
J Law Med Ethics 2009;37:420-430.
Industry attack on academics
Gornall
BMJ 2009;338:b736-b736.
FULL TEXT
Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols
Chan et al.
BMJ 2008;337:a2299-a2299.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Commercialism, Loss of Professionalism, and the Effect on Journals
Liesegang
Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1292-1295.
FULL TEXT
Reporting Bias in Diagnostic and Prognostic Studies: Time for Action
Rifai et al.
Clin. Chem. 2008;54:1101-1103.
FULL TEXT
|