This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (6)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Pacemakers/ Defibrillators  • Cardiovascular System  • Quality of Care  • Quality of Care, Other  • Arrhythmias  • Cardiovascular Intervention  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Bruce L. Wilkoff, MD

JAMA. 2006;295:1944-1946.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In this issue of JAMA, the reports by Maisel and colleagues^1-2 and by Gould and Krahn³ represent substantial pieces of an information mosaic that is developing about life-sustaining and life-saving implantable arrhythmia device technologies. It is apparent, not only to the medical community, but also to patients, the press, regulators, investors, and the legal community, that this information mosaic is complex. The technologies are complex. The medical issues are complex. The ethical issues are complex. The financial issues are complex. No effort should trivialize this complexity or oversimplify and produce "the solution" without understanding that the information comes with gaps and never forms more than an incomplete mosaic. These 3 studies^1-3 provide new data to inform the most important issue—how physicians and patients should make individual decisions regarding pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) surgery.

In the first study, Maisel¹ uses meta-analysis to evaluate the incidence . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Pacemaker and ICD generator malfunctions: analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual reports.
, , , , , , and
JAMA. ;295():1901-1906.
FULL TEXT  

Complications associated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator replacement in response to device advisories.
, , and
JAMA. ;295():1907-1911.
FULL TEXT  

Pacemaker and ICD generator reliability: meta-analysis of device registries.

JAMA. ;295():1929-1934.
FULL TEXT  

JAMA patient page. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
, , and
JAMA. ;295():1964-1964.
FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

ICD and Pacemaker Malfunctions
Journal Watch Cardiology 2006;2006:9-9.
FULL TEXT  

ICD and Pacemaker Malfunctions
Journal Watch Cardiology 2006;2006:2-2.
FULL TEXT  

What's new in the other general journals.
Tonks
BMJ 2006;332:1084-1085.
FULL TEXT