You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 295 No. 17, May 3, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Endocrine Diseases
 •Diabetes Mellitus
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Adverse Events Related to Muraglitazar Use in Diabetes—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Dr Najman and Dr Parra and colleagues raise important and valid concerns about dual PPAR agonists. Both letters recommend caution in the coadministration of fibric acid derivatives and thiazolidinediones, a strategy that would activate both PPAR-{alpha} and {gamma} receptors via 2 separate agents. Najman points out that some studies using the older PPAR-{alpha} agents gemfibrozil and bezafibrate showed nonsignificant increases in mortality. In addition, the recent Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study showed a 19% higher mortality rate in the fenofibrate treatment group (P = .22).1 In the muraglitazar analyses, we could not assess the impact of coadministration of the approved fibric acid derivatives because these agents were prohibited in the study designs.2-3

Both letters suggest that morbidity and mortality trials are needed before approval of new therapeutic classes to be used in high-risk populations, such as patients with diabetes. I would disagree with such a . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Steven E. Nissen, MD
nissens@ccf.org
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Adverse Events Related to Muraglitazar Use in Diabetes
David M. Najman
JAMA. 2006;295(17):1997.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Adverse Events Related to Muraglitazar Use in Diabetes
David Parra, Cherylyn Beckey, and Thomas Thomas
JAMA. 2006;295(17):1997-1998.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Muraglitazar on Death and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Steven E. Nissen, Kathy Wolski, and Eric J. Topol
JAMA. 2005;294(20):2581-2586.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Intensive therapy of type 2 diabetes (ACCORD trial) (OCTOBER 2008)
NAJMAN
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 2009;76:83-83.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.