You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 295 No. 21, June 7, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

High-Dose Statins and the IDEAL Study

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Pedersen and colleagues1 conclude that while high-dose atorvastatin for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease following acute myocardial infarction produced no statistically significant decrease in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality compared with usual-dose simvastatin, the lack of a difference between the 2 groups in adverse events classified as serious implies that patients with established coronary artery disease may benefit from intensive lipid lowering without serious adverse events.

While neither the primary end point of the study (all-cause or cardiovascular mortality) nor the outcome of serious adverse events reached statistical significance, 3 outcomes that did reach significance were drug discontinuations due to diarrhea, abdominal pain, and myalgias. Although the authors acknowledge that because it was an open-label trial the drug discontinuations may have been related to patients' knowledge of which drug they were taking, the study nevertheless provides better evidence for patient intolerance of atorvastatin than it does . . . [Full Text of this Article]

William E. Cayley, Jr, MD, MDiv
bcayley@yahoo.com
Department of Family Medicine
University of Wisconsin
Eau Claire



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

High-Dose Statins and the IDEAL Study
Uffe Ravnskov, Paul J. Rosch, and Morley C. Sutter
JAMA. 2006;295(21):2476.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Dose Statins and the IDEAL Study
Hean T. Ong and Jim Seng Cheah
JAMA. 2006;295(21):2476-2477.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Dose Statins and the IDEAL Study
Paul S. Chan, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, and Rodney A. Hayward
JAMA. 2006;295(21):2477.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Dose Statins and the IDEAL Study
Samuel J. Mann
JAMA. 2006;295(21):2477-2478.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Dose Statins and the IDEAL Study—Reply
Terje R. Pedersen, Ole Faergeman, John J. P. Kastelein, Anders G. Olsson, Matti J. Tikkanen, Ingar Holme, Mogens Lytken Larsen, and Fredrik S. Bendiksen
JAMA. 2006;295(21):2478-2479.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Dose Atorvastatin vs Usual-Dose Simvastatin for Secondary Prevention After Myocardial Infarction: The IDEAL Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Terje R. Pedersen, Ole Faergeman, John J. P. Kastelein, Anders G. Olsson, Matti J. Tikkanen, Ingar Holme, Mogens Lytken Larsen, Fredrik S. Bendiksen, Christina Lindahl, Michael Szarek, John Tsai, and for the Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) Study Group
JAMA. 2005;294(19):2437-2445.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.