You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 295 No. 21, June 7, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

High-Dose Statins and the IDEAL Study

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: The IDEAL study1 is 1 of 4 recent large clinical trials that have examined whether high-dose statins improve outcomes compared with conventional doses. The first 2 trials (PROVE-IT2 and A to Z3) enrolled patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), whereas the latter 2 trials (TNT4 and IDEAL1) enrolled patients with stable coronary artery disease. The results from these trials appear to conflict: PROVE-IT and TNT found statistically significant differences, whereas A-to-Z and IDEAL did not. Some of these conflicts may be related to the study designs.

It has become increasingly common for clinical trials to join nonequivalent outcomes into a single composite end point, such as combining mortality with new nonfatal myocardial infarction, revascularization, or rehospitalization.5 Indiscriminately combining mortality with other outcomes may lead to biases related to "competing risk," in which patients who die early in a trial are unable to experience future nonfatal . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Paul S. Chan, MD, MSc
paulchan@umich.edu

Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, MD, MPH; Rodney A. Hayward, MD
VA Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research
Ann Arbor, Mich


RELATED ARTICLES

High-Dose Statins and the IDEAL Study
Uffe Ravnskov, Paul J. Rosch, and Morley C. Sutter
JAMA. 2006;295(21):2476.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Dose Statins and the IDEAL Study
William E. Cayley, Jr
JAMA. 2006;295(21):2476.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Dose Statins and the IDEAL Study
Hean T. Ong and Jim Seng Cheah
JAMA. 2006;295(21):2476-2477.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Dose Statins and the IDEAL Study
Samuel J. Mann
JAMA. 2006;295(21):2477-2478.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Dose Statins and the IDEAL Study—Reply
Terje R. Pedersen, Ole Faergeman, John J. P. Kastelein, Anders G. Olsson, Matti J. Tikkanen, Ingar Holme, Mogens Lytken Larsen, and Fredrik S. Bendiksen
JAMA. 2006;295(21):2478-2479.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Dose Atorvastatin vs Usual-Dose Simvastatin for Secondary Prevention After Myocardial Infarction: The IDEAL Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Terje R. Pedersen, Ole Faergeman, John J. P. Kastelein, Anders G. Olsson, Matti J. Tikkanen, Ingar Holme, Mogens Lytken Larsen, Fredrik S. Bendiksen, Christina Lindahl, Michael Szarek, John Tsai, and for the Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) Study Group
JAMA. 2005;294(19):2437-2445.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Incremental Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness of High-Dose Statin Therapy in High-Risk Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
Chan et al.
Circulation 2007;115:2398-2409.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.