You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 295 No. 21, June 7, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

High-Dose Statins and the IDEAL Study

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: The IDEAL study1 reported that high-dose atorvastatin (80 mg/d) was more beneficial in preventing recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction than was low-dose simvastatin (20 mg/d). The achieved mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level was 81 mg/dL vs 104 mg/dL, respectively.

Clinicians face the question of how low the target LDL-C level should be. Unfortunately, studies assess event rates in the more intensively treated group vs the less intensively treated group, rather than assessing outcome based on LDL-C level achieved. It is likely that there were many more individuals with an achieved LDL-C well above 100 mg/dL in the simvastatin group than in the atorvastatin group. The greater number of events in the simvastatin group may have been a result of the larger proportion of patients with persisting elevation of LDL-C, rather than a result of the mean LDL-C of 104 mg/dL not being low enough.

The analysis clinicians . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Samuel J. Mann, MD
sjmann@med.cornell.edu
Department of Medicine
New York Presbyterian Hospital–Weill/Cornell Medical School
New York


RELATED ARTICLES

High-Dose Statins and the IDEAL Study
Uffe Ravnskov, Paul J. Rosch, and Morley C. Sutter
JAMA. 2006;295(21):2476.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Dose Statins and the IDEAL Study
William E. Cayley, Jr
JAMA. 2006;295(21):2476.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Dose Statins and the IDEAL Study
Hean T. Ong and Jim Seng Cheah
JAMA. 2006;295(21):2476-2477.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Dose Statins and the IDEAL Study
Paul S. Chan, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, and Rodney A. Hayward
JAMA. 2006;295(21):2477.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Dose Statins and the IDEAL Study—Reply
Terje R. Pedersen, Ole Faergeman, John J. P. Kastelein, Anders G. Olsson, Matti J. Tikkanen, Ingar Holme, Mogens Lytken Larsen, and Fredrik S. Bendiksen
JAMA. 2006;295(21):2478-2479.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Dose Atorvastatin vs Usual-Dose Simvastatin for Secondary Prevention After Myocardial Infarction: The IDEAL Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Terje R. Pedersen, Ole Faergeman, John J. P. Kastelein, Anders G. Olsson, Matti J. Tikkanen, Ingar Holme, Mogens Lytken Larsen, Fredrik S. Bendiksen, Christina Lindahl, Michael Szarek, John Tsai, and for the Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) Study Group
JAMA. 2005;294(19):2437-2445.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.