
An Algorithm for Managing Suspected Pulmonary EmbolismReply
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply: We disagree with Drs Takagi and Umemoto regarding their statement that other management studies indicate that patients classified as PE unlikely but with an abnormal D-dimer test ought to be treated with anticoagulant therapy.1-4 These studies demonstrate that in patients with a low probability of PE combined with a normal D-dimer test it is safe to exclude PE. However, in all other patients, including those with a low probability of PE and an abnormal D-dimer test, further objective testing is warranted to exclude or diagnose PE.
Wells et al1 suggested that it is safe to use 2 instead of 3 categories of pretest probability and to exclude PE in patients classified as PE unlikely combined with a normal D-dimer test, with the benefit of avoiding diagnostic tests in a larger percentage of patients. Our results prospectively validated this post hoc observation and showed that it is safe to . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Mathilde Nijkeuter, MD
Department of General Internal Medicine/Endocrinology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, the Netherlands
M. H. Prins, MD
Department of Clinical Epidemiology University Hospital Maastricht, the Netherlands
H. R. Büller, MD, PhD
Department of Vascular Medicine Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Menno V. Huisman, MD
m.v.huisman@lumc.nl Department of General Internal Medicine/Endocrinology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden, the Netherlands
for the Christopher Study Investigators
RELATED ARTICLES
An Algorithm for Managing Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
Hisato Takagi and Takuya Umemoto
JAMA. 2006;295(22):2603-2604.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effectiveness of Managing Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Using an Algorithm Combining Clinical Probability, D-Dimer Testing, and Computed Tomography
Writing Group for the Christopher Study Investigators
JAMA. 2006;295(2):172-179.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|