You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 295 No. 7, February 15, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Health Policy
 •Medical Ethics
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Pediatric Research and the Federal Minimal Risk Standard

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their Special Communication, Dr Wendler and colleagues1 discuss quantifying the federal minimal risk standard. We agree that the appropriate implementation of the minimal risk standard for pediatric research requires both a clear interpretation of the standard and empirical data on the risks that children face during daily life and routine examinations. However, we find their presentation of this standard misleading.

To argue in favor of an objective standard that defines minimal risk as indexed to the risks experienced by healthy children does not mean that the empirical data are sufficient. The minimal risk standard is both a statistical and a normative concept2 and cannot be reduced to the simplistic claim that because children experience certain risks in daily life, we should be able to expose these children to a similar level of risk within research. The empirical data could permit much greater risk than would be . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Lainie Friedman Ross, MD, PhD
lross@uchicago.edu
Department of Pediatrics
University of Chicago
Chicago, Ill

Robert M. Nelson, MD, PhD
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pa



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Pediatric Research and the Federal Minimal Risk Standard—Reply
David Wendler, Leah Belsky, Kimberly M. Thompson, and Ezekiel J. Emanuel
JAMA. 2006;295(7):759-760.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quantifying the Federal Minimal Risk Standard: Implications for Pediatric Research Without a Prospect of Direct Benefit
David Wendler, Leah Belsky, Kimberly M. Thompson, and Ezekiel J. Emanuel
JAMA. 2005;294(7):826-832.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Minimal Risk in Pediatric Research as a Function of Age
Wendler
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009;163:115-118.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.