You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 1, July 5, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Urinary Tract Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

NMP22 and Surveillance for Recurrent Bladder Cancer

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: The results of the study of the NMP22 assay for bladder cancer surveillance by Dr Grossman and colleagues1 do not justify adopting this test for such use. First, the assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of the NMP22 assay was flawed. Diagnostic test evaluation requires the uniform application of an unambiguous reference standard.2 The authors used the reference standard of cystoscopy, but it is unclear how often it was applied. The cross-sectional design of the study implies that all patients underwent a single cystoscopy at the time of NMP22 testing. However, at least 9 patients—and as many as 574 not diagnosed as having cancer at their initial cystoscopy—also underwent repeat cystoscopy. If not all 574 patients underwent a repeat examination, then the reference standard was applied inconsistently, raising questions about whether the NMP22 result prompted the repeat cystoscopy, thus inflating the sensitivity of the NMP22 assay (workup . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Chad T. Wilson, MD
chad.t.wilson@dartmouth.edu
VA Outcomes Group
Vermont Veterans Affairs Medical Center
White River Junction



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

NMP22 and Surveillance for Recurrent Bladder Cancer
Scott Eggener and Harry Herr
JAMA. 2006;296(1):45.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

NMP22 and Surveillance for Recurrent Bladder Cancer—Reply
H. Barton Grossman
JAMA. 2006;296(1):45-46.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surveillance for Recurrent Bladder Cancer Using a Point-of-Care Proteomic Assay
H. Barton Grossman, Mark Soloway, Edward Messing, Giora Katz, Barry Stein, Vahan Kassabian, and Yu Shen
JAMA. 2006;295(3):299-305.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Group writing of letters to the editor as the goal of journal club.
Kallen et al.
JAMA 2006;296:1053-1054.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.