You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 1, July 5, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Informatics, Other
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Measuring Hospital Quality

What Physicians Do? How Patients Fare? Or Both?

Ashish K. Jha, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2006;296:95-97.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Just 2 decades ago, most US citizens presumed they received high-quality care, and neither patients nor physicians were much concerned with quality measurement. The landscape has changed. Lapses in quality of care provided by the US health care system—the most expensive health care system in the world—are now widely recognized.1-2 The Institute of Medicine's report of 2001 proclaimed a chasm between how the US health care system currently performs and its ideal1; since then, more recent data show persistent deficiencies in care.2 There is little doubt of the ample opportunities to improve the health care Americans receive.

With ongoing concerns about deficiencies in care, the need for valid and broadscale measures of quality is clear. However, despite much work, there is no consensus on which aspects of quality to measure: should the focus be "processes" of care, such as whether physicians or hospitals consistently . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, VA Boston Healthcare System and the Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Hospital Quality for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Correlation Among Process Measures and Relationship With Short-term Mortality
Elizabeth H. Bradley, Jeph Herrin, Brian Elbel, Robert L. McNamara, David J. Magid, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, Yongfei Wang, Sharon-Lise T. Normand, John A. Spertus, and Harlan M. Krumholz
JAMA. 2006;296(1):72-78.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Performance indicators in acute myocardial infarction: a proposal for the future assessment of good quality care
Weston
Heart 2008;94:1397-1401.
FULL TEXT  

Burden of Comorbid Medical Conditions and Quality of Diabetes Care
Halanych et al.
Diabetes Care 2007;30:2999-3004.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

"America's Best Hospitals" in the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Wang et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1345-1351.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Hospital Care for Acute MI
Journal Watch Cardiology 2006;2006:5-5.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.