You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 13, October 4, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Education
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Credentialing, Recertification, and Public Accountability

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: The Editorial on credentialing and public accountability by Drs Cassel and Holmboe1 concludes that, as a result of process and criteria changes within the last 5 years, future studies "might show a more rigorous approach to monitoring certification status as well as a more robust data exchange that would allow certification to be even more effective in its ability to identify competence and facilitate quality improvement and excellence in physicians." However, the comments in the 2 related studies on board certification in pediatrics by Dr Freed and colleagues2-3 make it clear that there is little, if any, evidence to demonstrate superior competency, improved care, or added learning between initially certified physicians who elect to recertify and those who do not.

The assertion that recertification is needed to reassure patients and the general public of physician competence throughout their careers is debatable. It is likely that the public . . . [Full Text of this Article]

F. Michael Gloth III, MD
mgloth@victorysprings.com
Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Md



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Credentialing, Recertification, and Public Accountability—Reply
Gary L. Freed
JAMA. 2006;296(13):1588.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Credentialing, Recertification, and Public Accountability—Reply
Christine K. Cassel and Eric S. Holmboe
JAMA. 2006;296(13):1588-1589.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Policies and Practices Related to the Role of Board Certification and Recertification of Pediatricians in Hospital Privileging
Gary L. Freed, Rebecca L. Uren, Ericka J. Hudson, Indu Lakhani, John R. C. Wheeler, James A. Stockman, III, and for the Research Advisory Committee of the American Board of Pediatrics
JAMA. 2006;295(8):905-912.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Board Certification and Recertification of Pediatricians in Health Plan Credentialing Policies
Gary L. Freed, Dianne Singer, Indu Lakhani, John R. C. Wheeler, James A. Stockman, III, and for the Research Advisory Committee of the American Board of Pediatrics
JAMA. 2006;295(8):913-918.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Credentialing and Public Accountability: A Central Role for Board Certification
Christine K. Cassel and Eric S. Holmboe
JAMA. 2006;295(8):939-940.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.