You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 15, October 18, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Revascularization
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents, Brachytherapy, and In-Stent Restenosis

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 134 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Stone and colleagues1 compared paclitaxel-eluting stents with vascular brachytherapy (VBT) for in-stent stenosis within bare-metal stents. In the "Comment" section, the authors stated, "Because of both greater acute gain and less late loss, luminal dimensions were significantly larger with paclitaxel-eluting stents compared with VBT in the injury zone, at the distal edge, and over the entire analysis segment."

However, Table 4 shows significantly greater late loss with paclitaxel-eluting stents (median, 0.27 mm) compared with VBT (median, 0.11 mm; P<.001) in the injury segment. Smaller lumen diameter and higher restenosis were mainly due to less acute gain, suggesting suboptimal initial mechanical treatment (angioplasty) before beta radiation therapy. If sufficient acute gain could be achieved before beta radiation therapy, VBT might be still an option for in-stent restenosis.

Financial Disclosures: None reported.

Hideaki Kaneda, MD, PhD
kaneda@kamakuraheart.org
Shonan Kamakura General Hospital
Kamakura, Japan

Junya Ako, MD
Stanford University
Stanford, Calif

1. Stone GW, Ellis SG, O'Shaughnessy CD, et al, TAXUS V ISR Investigators. Paclitaxel-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the TAXUS V ISR randomized trial. JAMA. 2006;295:1253-1263. FREE FULL TEXT

Letters Section Editor: Robert M. Golub, MD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2006;296:1838.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents, Brachytherapy, and In-Stent Restenosis—Reply
Gregg W. Stone, Jeffrey J. Popma, and Stephen G. Ellis
JAMA. 2006;296(15):1838-1839.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents vs Vascular Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis Within Bare-Metal Stents: The TAXUS V ISR Randomized Trial
Gregg W. Stone, Stephen G. Ellis, Charles D. O’Shaughnessy, Steven L. Martin, Lowell Satler, Thomas McGarry, Mark A. Turco, Dean J. Kereiakes, Lynne Kelley, Jeffrey J. Popma, Mary E. Russell, and for the TAXUS V ISR Investigators
JAMA. 2006;295(11):1253-1263.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.