You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 16, October 25, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Occupational and Environmental Medicine
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Pulmonary Diseases
 •Pulmonary Diseases, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Hospital Admissions and Fine Particulate Air Pollution

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: The article by Dr Dominici and colleagues1 is intended as scientific evidence that can provide a rationale for setting a PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard by the EPA. Although this study is carefully constructed, it does not consider several problems that should be addressed before these results can coherently be used for establishing public policy.

First, individuals spend about 85% of their time indoors2 so it is important to account for indoor exposure risk factors for the diseases considered. Aside from smoking (which was apparently not included either as passive or direct), there are etiologically relevant (inflammatory) risk factors that have not been included in the exposure-response model. For example, exposure to molds is associated with respiratory tract infections, one of the end points in the study. Similarly, there are no controls for body mass index and income.

Second, the authors report negative percentage changes in . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Paolo F. Ricci, PhD, LLM
Department of Environmental Sciences
College of Arts and Sciences
University of San Francisco
San Francisco, Calif

Sorin R. Straja, PhD
straja@nars.org
Institute for Regulatory Science
Columbia, Md



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Hospital Admissions and Fine Particulate Air Pollution
George D. Thurston
JAMA. 2006;296(16):1966.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hospital Admissions and Fine Particulate Air Pollution—Reply
Francesca Dominici, Roger D. Peng, Michelle L. Bell, Luu Pham, Aidan McDermott, Scott L. Zeger, and Jonathan M. Samet
JAMA. 2006;296(16):1966-1967.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fine Particulate Air Pollution and Hospital Admission for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Diseases
Francesca Dominici, Roger D. Peng, Michelle L. Bell, Luu Pham, Aidan McDermott, Scott L. Zeger, and Jonathan M. Samet
JAMA. 2006;295(10):1127-1134.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.