You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 17, November 1, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Brain Cancer
 •Radiation Therapy
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Oncology
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Radiosurgery Plus Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Dr Patchell and colleagues raise important issues and limitations in the trial by Dr Aoyama and colleagues.1 It was indeed underpowered to show equivalence between SRS and SRS plus WBRT. It was terminated early because interim analyses indicated that it would not accrue enough patients to detect a significant difference in the primary end point of survival. Despite this limitation, the study confirmed retrospective data suggesting that WBRT can be deferred.2-4

Although a higher rate of neurological deterioration attributable to brain metastases was reported in the SRS group, it is unknown whether this decline is related to local vs distant failure; certainly, failure due to distant brain disease would favor an approach using WBRT. The increased neurological deterioration did not result in increased neurological death and was only present in a subset of patients in each group. Although no differences in cognitive function were reported between the groups, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Jeffrey Raizer, MD
jraizer@nmff.org
Feinberg School of Medicine
Northwestern University
Chicago, Ill



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Radiosurgery Plus Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases
Roy A. Patchell, William F. Regine, Jay S. Loeffler, Raymond Sawaya, David W. Andrews, and Lawrence S. Chin
JAMA. 2006;296(17):2089-2090.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Radiosurgery Plus Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases—Reply
Hidefumi Aoyama, Hiroki Shirato, Masao Tago, Keiichi Nakagawa, and Gen Kobashi
JAMA. 2006;296(17):2090.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

Stereotactic Radiosurgery Plus Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy vs Stereotactic Radiosurgery Alone for Treatment of Brain Metastases: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Hidefumi Aoyama, Hiroki Shirato, Masao Tago, Keiichi Nakagawa, Tatsuya Toyoda, Kazuo Hatano, Masahiro Kenjyo, Natsuo Oya, Saeko Hirota, Hiroki Shioura, Etsuo Kunieda, Taisuke Inomata, Kazushige Hayakawa, Norio Katoh, and Gen Kobashi
JAMA. 2006;295(21):2483-2491.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Radiosurgery and Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: Either or Both as the Optimal Treatment
Jeffrey Raizer
JAMA. 2006;295(21):2535-2536.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.