 |
 |

Risk of Serious Infections and Malignancies With Anti-TNF Antibody Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Dr Bongartz and colleagues1 reported the results of a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of the TNF-blocking monoclonal antibodies infliximab and adalimumab, finding an increased risk of serious infections and malignancies associated with their use. However, previous meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials of infliximab and adalimumab were conducted at the request of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), leading to revised product labeling for infliximab in September 2005 and for adalimumab in October 2005.
The FDA-requested analyses differ in several important respects from that of Bongartz et al. First, the FDA requested that the analyses be adjusted for duration of exposure, since a greater dropout rate in the control arms than in the TNF-blocker arm (due to lack of efficacy) hinders subsequent ascertainment of events in the control arm. Second, the FDA requested meta-analyses for all 3 approved TNF-blockers, including etanercept, not just the TNF-blocking monoclonal . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Sarah K. Okada, MD;
Jeffrey N. Siegel, MD
Jeffrey.Siegel@fda.hhs.gov Division of Anesthesia, Analgesia, and Rheumatology Products Office of Drug Evaluation II Center for Drug Evaluation and Research US Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring, Md
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Updated consensus statement on biological agents for the treatment of rheumatic diseases, 2008
Furst et al.
Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67:iii2-iii25.
FULL TEXT
Updated consensus statement on biological agents for the treatment of rheumatic diseases, 2007
Furst et al.
Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:iii2-iii22.
FULL TEXT
|