You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 19, November 15, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Public Health, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Comparison of Health Status Between the United States and England

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Banks and colleagues1 found significantly higher prevalences of several chronic conditions in the United States compared with England. They used 2002 data from a study population of persons between the ages of 55 and 64 years, middle-aged survivors of the 1938-1947 birth cohorts in both countries. An additional area for exploration would be comparison of the health experience of both birth cohorts.

The prevalence of any chronic condition is a function of disease incidence and disease duration. A higher prevalence of diabetes in the United States, for example, could arise from the occurrence of more cases of diabetes, longer survival of patients with diabetes, or both.2 The interpretation of a comparison of disease prevalence between 2 populations depends on defining the contribution of each of these factors. Because a higher incidence would represent a health disadvantage and a greater survival rate would represent a health advantage . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Edward Whitney, MD
edward.whitney@state.co.us
Colorado Division of Workers' Compensation
Denver



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Comparison of Health Status Between the United States and England.

JAMA. ;296():2312-2312.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Health Status Between the United States and England.

JAMA. ;296():2312-2312.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Health Status Between the United States and England--Reply
, , , and
JAMA. ;296():2313-2313.
FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Disease and disadvantage in the United States and in England.
, , , and
JAMA. ;295():2037-2045.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Health Disadvantage in US Adults Aged 50 to 74 Years: A Comparison of the Health of Rich and Poor Americans With That of Europeans
Avendano et al.
AJPH 2009;99:540-548.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.