You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 20, November 22/29, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Pain
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Interpreting Surgical Trials With Subjective Outcomes

Avoiding UnSPORTsmanlike Conduct

David R. Flum, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2006;296:2483-2485.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In this issue of JAMA, 2 articles1-2 report results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). One study is a multicenter trial1 of patients with persistent disk-related pain and neurologic symptoms randomized to undergo diskectomy or receive usual care (most often, patient education, anti-inflammatory medication, and physical therapy, alone or in combination). Because the investigators expected high rates of refusal of randomization based on the differential risk of these 2 treatment strategies, they developed a parallel observational study of patients who qualified for the randomized trial but refused randomization.2 Patients in both the randomized trial and the observational cohort study were similar in almost all characteristics and were followed up in a similar fashion for 2 years.

The SPORT randomized trial had such a high proportion of patients who crossed over between treatment strategies (45%-60%) and such a significant degree of missing data . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle. Dr Flum (daveflum@u.washington.edu) is Contributing Editor, JAMA.


RELATED LETTERS

Sham Surgery in Clinical Trials
Peter Angelos
JAMA. 2007;297(14):1545-1546.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sham Surgery in Clinical Trials—Reply
David R. Flum
JAMA. 2007;297(14):1546.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk Herniation: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): A Randomized Trial
James N. Weinstein, Tor D. Tosteson, Jon D. Lurie, Anna N. A. Tosteson, Brett Hanscom, Jonathan S. Skinner, William A. Abdu, Alan S. Hilibrand, Scott D. Boden, and Richard A. Deyo
JAMA. 2006;296(20):2441-2450.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk Herniation: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) Observational Cohort
James N. Weinstein, Jon D. Lurie, Tor D. Tosteson, Jonathan S. Skinner, Brett Hanscom, Anna N. A. Tosteson, Harry Herkowitz, Jeffrey Fischgrund, Frank P. Cammisa, Todd Albert, and Richard A. Deyo
JAMA. 2006;296(20):2451-2459.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Role of NETT in Emphysema Research
Wise and Drummond
Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008;5:385-392.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gizmo Idolatry
Leff and Finucane
JAMA 2008;299:1830-1832.
FULL TEXT  

Ethical Issues Confronted In Pulmonary Clinical Trials
Wise
Proc Am Thorac Soc 2007;4:200-205.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Either Surgery or Nonoperative Treatment Led to Improvement in Intervertebral Disc Herniation
Mirza
JBJS 2007;89:1139-1139.
FULL TEXT  

Sham Surgery in Clinical Trials
Angelos
JAMA 2007;297:1545-1546.
FULL TEXT  

Is Surgery Necessary for Lumbar Disc Herniation?
JWatch General 2006;2006:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.