You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 21, December 6, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Health Policy
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

A Pay-for-Population Health Performance System

David A. Kindig, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2006;296:2611-2613.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The report Rewarding Provider Performance,1 recently released by the Institute of Medicine, concludes that early experience with pay-for-performance has been promising and recommends that Medicare begin to phase in this strategy to foster comprehensive and system-wide improvements in the quality of health care. Even though the effectiveness of pay-for-performance in medical care has been evaluated in fewer than 20 studies and the conclusions on its impact have been mixed, the need for reform is so great that beginning to move cautiously in this direction has been endorsed by the panel involved in the Institute of Medicine's report.

But improvements in the quality of health care alone will be inadequate to significantly improve population health. A decade ago I asserted that "population health improvement will not be achieved until appropriate financial incentives are designed for this outcome"2 and proposed a 20-year timetable, which would begin with . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Pay-for-Performance in Medical Care Alone Will Not Improve Population Health

Author Affiliation: Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Population Health Framework for Setting National and State Health Goals
Kindig et al.
JAMA 2008;299:2081-2083.
FULL TEXT  

Crossroads In Quality
O'Kane et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:749-758.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

We Can Do Better -- Improving the Health of the American People
Schroeder
NEJM 2007;357:1221-1228.
FULL TEXT  

For Love, for Money, or for Both?: Which Way Will We Choose to Transform Children's Health Care?
Homer
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:715-717.
FULL TEXT  

Managing Medical Resources: Return to the Commons?
Cassel and Brennan
JAMA 2007;297:2518-2521.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.