You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 23, December 20, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Medical News & Perspectives
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Caring for the Uninsured and Underinsured
 •Health Policy
 •Pediatrics
 •Neonatology and Infant Care
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

New Policy Puts Some Newborns at Risk

Medical Groups Denounce Medicaid Changes

Bridget M. Kuehn

JAMA. 2006;296:2788-2790.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Infants born in the United States to immigrant parents may find necessary medical care delayed or withheld because of changes to Medicaid that toughen documentation requirements and do away with grace periods for these infants, say several health care organizations that are fighting the changes.

The tough new documentation requirements, which appeared July 12 in the Federal Register (http://www.cms.hhs.gov/MedicaidEligibility/downloads/MedicaidCitizenshipFinalRule.pdf), are part of a broader effort by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to require all new and renewing Medicaid beneficiaries to produce documentation proving they are US citizens. A coalition of 6 organizations—the American Academy of Family Physicians; the American Academy of Pediatrics; the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses; the March of Dimes; and the National Association of Children's Hospitals—opposes the changes targeting newborns, saying they create unnecessary barriers to medical care for . . . [Full Text of this Article]

COSTLY DELAYS



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.