 |
 |

Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Cancer RiskReply
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply: Dr Chen and colleagues note 2 points of contention with our systematic review: the validity of dietary assessments for estimating fatty acid intake and our assessment of the quality of the animal and in vitro literature.
They are correct that the studies included in our meta-analysis did not measure fatty acid composition but rather estimated intake of fatty acids based on dietary information obtained from patients. However, their assertion that the methods used to define fatty acid intake in these studies were not valid is contradicted by other studies. As evidence that dietary questionnaires and records correlate poorly with direct measurements in patients, Chen et al cited 2 studies. The first study1 reported correlation coefficients between patient-reported intakes and measured content in subcutaneous tissue of 0.49 to 0.50 (P<.001) for polyunsaturated fats and 0.47 (P<.001) for eicosapentaenoic acid. Although not perfect, these correlations cannot . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Catherine H. MacLean, MD, PhD
maclean@rand.org
Sydne J. Newberry, PhD
RAND Health Santa Monica, Calif
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Cancer Risk
Yong Q. Chen, Isabelle M. Berquin, Larry W. Daniel, Iris J. Edwards, Joseph T. OFlaherty, Mike J. Thomas, Janet A. Tooze, and Bob Wykle
JAMA. 2006;296(3):282.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review
Catherine H. MacLean, Sydne J. Newberry, Walter A. Mojica, Puja Khanna, Amalia M. Issa, Marika J. Suttorp, Yee-Wee Lim, Shana B. Traina, Lara Hilton, Rena Garland, and Sally C. Morton
JAMA. 2006;295(4):403-415.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|