You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 4, July 26, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Quality of Care
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Use of Aspirin as Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their sex-specific meta-analysis of aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, Dr Berger and colleagues1 found results similar to the meta-analysis we performed as part of the primary report of the Women's Health Study.2 However, meta-analyses can hide important clinical effects—in this case, the evidence of effect modification by age. In the Women's Health Study, the most consistent benefit of aspirin was observed among women aged 65 years or older, a group who comprised only 10% of the study population yet had almost one third of the total cardiovascular events.

This is relevant to any discussion of number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH). Berger et al compared these measures between all men and all women and found little difference. However, the data in the Women's Health Study allowed age-specific estimates of the 10-year NNT and NNH for low-dose aspirin compared . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Paul M Ridker, MD
pridker@partners.org

Nancy R. Cook, ScD; Julie E Buring, ScD
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Mass



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Aspirin for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Women and Men: A Sex-Specific Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
, , , , , and
JAMA. ;295():306-313.
FULL TEXT  

Use of aspirin as primary prevention of cardiovascular events.

JAMA. ;296():391-391.
FULL TEXT  

Use of Aspirin as Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events--Reply
and
JAMA. ;296():391-392.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Confounding of Subgroup Analyses in Randomized Data
Groenwold et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1532-1534.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Aspirin Treatment in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Events in Subgroups Based on Age, Gender, and Varying Cardiovascular Risk
Greving et al.
Circulation 2008;117:2875-2883.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.