 |
 |

Use of Aspirin as Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 130 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: The meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events by Dr Berger and colleagues1 reported that aspirin decreased the incidence of myocardial infarction in men, but not in women. However, the aspirin dose in the 5 trials that included men ranged from 75 mg/d to 500 mg/d. The dose in the 3 trials that included women ranged from 50 mg/d (100 mg every other day) to 100 mg/d.
Rather than concluding that aspirin does not prevent myocardial infarction in women, it is more accurate to state that aspirin in doses of 100 mg/d or less is ineffective in preventing myocardial infarction in women. It is possible that a dose of 160 mg/d or more may be effective.2
Financial Disclosures: None reported.
James E. Dalen, MD, MPH
jamesdalen@yahoo.com University of Arizona Tucson
1. Berger JS, Roncaglioni MC, Avanzini F, et al. Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in women and men: a sex-specific meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2006;295:306-313.
FREE FULL TEXT
2. Dalen JE. Aspirin to prevent heart attack and stroke: what is the right dose? Am J Med. 2006;119:198-202.
FULL TEXT
|
ISI
| PUBMED
Letters Section Editor: Robert M. Golub, MD, Senior Editor.
JAMA. 2006;296:391.
RELATED ARTICLES
Use of Aspirin as Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events
Paul M Ridker, Nancy R. Cook, and Julie E Buring
JAMA. 2006;296(4):391.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Use of Aspirin as Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular EventsReply
Jeffrey S. Berger and David L. Brown
JAMA. 2006;296(4):391-392.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Aspirin for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Women and Men: A Sex-Specific Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Jeffrey S. Berger, Maria C. Roncaglioni, Fausto Avanzini, Ierta Pangrazzi, Gianni Tognoni, and David L. Brown
JAMA. 2006;295(3):306-313.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|