You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 4, July 26, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Pulmonary Diseases
 •Pulmonary Diseases, Other
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

High Humidity, Low Humidity, and Mist Therapy for Croup

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their study comparing controlled delivery of high humidity, low humidity, and mist therapy for croup in emergency departments, Dr Scolnik and colleagues1 demonstrated that mist therapy does not lead to an improvement in croup scores. Their study also suggests that a reexamination of the use of aerosolized epinephrine in mild croup is warranted.

Aerosolized epinephrine use for croup in the emergency department has generally been reserved for moderate to severe disease for 2 reasons. First, mild disease has been believed to respond to cool mist so that aerosolized epinephrine is not necessary.2 Second, all patients who get aerosolized epinephrine are believed to require several hours of observation in the emergency department prior to discharge.3

Scolnik et al cast considerable doubt on the first reason. The second, however, is dubious as well. The effect of aerosolized epinephrine is temporary, and there is some possibility of the patient . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Richard Gabor, MD
mail@rickygabor.com
Department of Emergency Medicine
Baystate Medical Center
Springfield, Mass



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

High Humidity, Low Humidity, and Mist Therapy for Croup—Reply
Dennis Scolnik, Allan L. Coates, Derek Stephens, Zelia Da Silva, Elana Lavine, and Suzanne Schuh
JAMA. 2006;296(4):394.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Controlled Delivery of High vs Low Humidity vs Mist Therapy for Croup in Emergency Departments: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Dennis Scolnik, Allan L. Coates, Derek Stephens, Zelia Da Silva, Elana Lavine, and Suzanne Schuh
JAMA. 2006;295(11):1274-1280.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.