You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 296 No. 8, August 23/30, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Thrombolysis
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Subcutaneous Unfractionated Heparin vs Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Acute Thromboembolic Disease

Issues of Efficacy and Cost

Jeffrey L. Carson, MD

JAMA. 2006;296:991-993.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Since 1960, when Barrett and Jordan established that anticoagulation reduced the risk of death in patients with pulmonary embolism,1 heparin has been the treatment of choice for thromboembolic disease. Heparin was initially administered by intravenous bolus every 4 hours until clinical trials showed that unfractionated intravenous infusion was associated with less bleeding.2-3 Unfractionated heparin was administered by intravenous infusion and the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was monitored to maintain a level between 1.5 to 2.5 times control. It was common practice to begin treatment with a loading dose of 5000 units and 1000 units per hour of infusion. Clinical experience revealed that many patients had subtherapeutic aPTT levels for more than 24 hours and were more likely to develop recurrent thromboembolism.4-5 Today, the standard of care is to use a weight-based algorithm6 or other heparin protocols7 that quickly achieve therapeutic targets for the aPTT.

Low-molecular-weight . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.


RELATED ARTICLE

Comparison of Fixed-Dose Weight-Adjusted Unfractionated Heparin and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Acute Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism
Clive Kearon, Jeffrey S. Ginsberg, Jim A. Julian, James Douketis, Susan Solymoss, Paul Ockelford, Sharon Jackson, Alexander G. Turpie, Betsy MacKinnon, Jack Hirsh, Michael Gent, and for the Fixed-Dose Heparin (FIDO) Investigators
JAMA. 2006;296(8):935-942.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Initial management of deep venous thrombosis in the outpatient setting
Groce
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008;65:866-874.
FULL TEXT  

Subcutaneous Unfractionated vs. Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Venous Thromboembolism
JWatch General 2006;2006:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

Subcutaneous UFH vs. LMWH for Acute VTE
Journal Watch Cardiology 2006;2006:5-5.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.