 |
 |

Pioglitazone vs Glimepiride and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: The CHICAGO (Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Atherosclerosis Using Pioglitazone) trial by Dr Mazzone and colleagues1 found a reduced progression of carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus taking pioglitazone for 18 months, compared with those taking glimepiride. There was no regression of CIMT in either treatment group.
However, the absolute decrease in mean glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level was only between 0.3% and 0.4%, which is less than expected based on other studies in patients with similar starting HbA1c values.2 It is surprising that the mean HbA1c value in the glimepiride group returned to baseline by 18 months despite ongoing glimepiride treatment. The treatment comparison appears to be between a weak hypoglycemic insulin-sensitizer (pioglitazone) and an ineffective secretagogue (glimepiride).
Given this, the difference in overall glycemic control between groups might have played a role in the results for changes in CIMT and . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Dario Giugliano, MD, PhD
dario.giugliano@unina2.it
Katherine Esposito, MD, PhD
Department of Geriatrics and Metabolic Diseases University of Naples SUN Naples, Italy
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED LETTERS
Pioglitazone vs Glimepiride and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness
Yujiro Kida and Tetsuji Sato
JAMA. 2007;297(12):1316.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pioglitazone vs Glimepiride and Carotid Intima-Media ThicknessReply
Theodore Mazzone
JAMA. 2007;297(12):1316-1317.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
Effect of Pioglitazone Compared With Glimepiride on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial
Theodore Mazzone, Peter M. Meyer, Steven B. Feinstein, Michael H. Davidson, George T. Kondos, Ralph B. DAgostino, Sr, Alfonso Perez, Jean-Claude Provost, and Steven M. Haffner
JAMA. 2006;296(21):2572-2581.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|