 |
 |

Pioglitazone vs Glimepiride and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Dr Mazzone and colleagues1 showed that pioglitazone slowed progression of CIMT compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes. The absolute change of CIMT was used as the primary end point instead of the number of cardiovascular events because CIMT is strongly associated with risk of future cardiovascular events.2
Microalbuminuria is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes.3 Moreover, a multivariate analysis that adjusted for a number of confounding factors, such as age, sex, blood pressure, body mass index, duration of diabetes, HbA1c level, smoking status, plasma lipid levels, and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and statins, found that only the presence and degree of microalbuminuria were independently associated with CIMT.4 In patients with type 2 diabetes, CIMT values were significantly higher among those with microalbuminuria compared with those with normoalbuminuria (P = .001).4
Treatments that lower albuminuria have been associated with . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Yujiro Kida, MD, PhD;
Tetsuji Sato, DMD, PhD
Department of Anatomy II Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine Yokohama, Japan
RELATED LETTERS
Pioglitazone vs Glimepiride and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness
Dario Giugliano and Katherine Esposito
JAMA. 2007;297(12):1315-1316.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pioglitazone vs Glimepiride and Carotid Intima-Media ThicknessReply
Theodore Mazzone
JAMA. 2007;297(12):1316-1317.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
Effect of Pioglitazone Compared With Glimepiride on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial
Theodore Mazzone, Peter M. Meyer, Steven B. Feinstein, Michael H. Davidson, George T. Kondos, Ralph B. DAgostino, Sr, Alfonso Perez, Jean-Claude Provost, and Steven M. Haffner
JAMA. 2006;296(21):2572-2581.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|