This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (6)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letter  • Related article  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Primary Care/ Family Medicine  • Public Health, Other  • Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction  • Drug Therapy, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

The High Public Burden of Low Individual Risk

Michael S. Lauer, MD

JAMA. 2007;297:1376-1378. Published online March 25, 2007 (doi:10.1001/jama.297.12.1376).

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Physicians and many laypeople are well aware of the substantial risks posed by asymptomatic atherosclerosis.¹ Among 50-year-old adults enrolled in the Framingham Heart Study, the lifetime risk for developing symptomatic disease was 52% in men and 39% in women.² For many patients the first clinical manifestation is a potentially catastrophic event, such as stroke, myocardial infarction, or sudden death.¹ Despite numerous advances in the understanding of the epidemiology and prevention of clinical atherosclerosis, the public disease burden remains high and may, with the current obesity epidemic, be increasing.³ Primary prevention, that is preventing or delaying clinical disease among asymptomatic individuals, therefore remains an issue of major public health interest.

Guidelines for clinicians caring for asymptomatic adults focus on assessment of individual risk, lifestyle interventions, and, when appropriate, pharmacological strategies, including aspirin⁴ and lipid-lowering drugs.⁵ One recommended approach^{4, 6} starts with estimating risk of clinical events using the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology, and Biostatistics, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. Dr Lauer is also Contributing Editor, JAMA.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Legislating Screening for Atherosclerosis
Erling Falk, Morteza Naghavi, and P. K. Shah
JAMA. 2008;299(18):2147-2148.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Effect of Rosuvastatin on Progression of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Low-Risk Individuals With Subclinical Atherosclerosis: The METEOR Trial
John R. Crouse, III, Joel S. Raichlen, Ward A. Riley, Gregory W. Evans, Mike K. Palmer, Daniel H. O’Leary, Diederick E. Grobbee, Michiel L. Bots, and for the METEOR Study Group
JAMA. 2007;297(12):1344-1353.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Atherosclerosis Imaging: Prognostically Useful or Merely More of What We Know?
Kaul and Douglas
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:150-160.
FULL TEXT  

Atherosclerotic plaque, adventitia, perivascular fat, and carotid imaging.
Falk et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2009;2:183-186.
FULL TEXT  

Legislating Screening for Atherosclerosis
Falk et al.
JAMA 2008;299:2147-2148.
FULL TEXT  

Transforming Clinical Practice Guidelines Into Legislative Mandates: Proceed With Abundant Caution
Jacobson
JAMA 2008;299:208-210.
FULL TEXT  

Subendothelial Lipoprotein Retention as the Initiating Process in Atherosclerosis: Update and Therapeutic Implications
Tabas et al.
Circulation 2007;116:1832-1844.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

METEOR: Does Rosuvastatin Benefit Low-Risk Patients?
Journal Watch Cardiology 2007;2007:1-1.
FULL TEXT