You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 297 No. 13, April 4, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Pulmonary Diseases
 •Pneumonia
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Medicare’s Hospital Compare Performance Measures and Mortality Rates—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Dr Fierer raises an important point: 3 of the performance measures used by the Hospital Quality Alliance that we studied are not based on evidence from randomized controlled trials. It may, however, be reasonable to implement some performance measures based on observational data because some interventions are not feasible to study in a randomized controlled trial. Limiting measures to those with randomized controlled trial evidence would limit the clinical areas in which performance measurement is possible, increasing the difficulty of providing meaningful information about quality through performance measurement. Indeed, numerous established performance measures are based on results from observational studies and expert consensus.1 However, when the potential benefit from a measured intervention is uncertain or small, there is increased risk that the inaccuracy of performance measurement will outweigh the benefits. We agree that there must be vigilance in balancing the potential unintended consequences of performance measurement, such as . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Rachel M. Werner, MD, PhD
rwerner@mail.med.upenn.edu
Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion
Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Philadelphia, Pa

Eric T. Bradlow, PhD
Department of Marketing
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Medicare’s Hospital Compare Performance Measures and Mortality Rates
Joshua Fierer
JAMA. 2007;297(13):1430.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medicare’s Hospital Compare Performance Measures and Mortality Rates
Paul Shekelle
JAMA. 2007;297(13):1430-1431.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Relationship Between Medicare’s Hospital Compare Performance Measures and Mortality Rates
Rachel M. Werner and Eric T. Bradlow
JAMA. 2006;296(22):2694-2702.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.