You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 297 No. 17, May 2, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Revascularization
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Pexelizumab and the APEX AMI Trial

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: As authors of the Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction (APEX AMI) trial,1 and on behalf of the APEX AMI study group, we believe that the accompanying Editorial by Drs Eikelboom and O’Donnell2 raises 3 issues deserving clarification. First, the Editorial questions the rationale for targeting one half of the original number of anticipated events. Prior to unblinding the results, we reported3 that the rationale was based in part on the prior systematic overview.4 When combined with the results from Pexelizumab for Reduction of Infarction and Mortality in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting surgery (PRIMO-CABG II) in a meta-analysis, there was an overall relative risk reduction of 24% (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.93; log rank P = .009) in all-cause 30-day mortality.5 If that effect had been observed in APEX, it would have achieved statistical significance (P<.05).

Second, the authors suggest that the meta-analysis5 failed to include . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Paul W. Armstrong, MD
paul.armstrong@ualberta.ca
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta

Christopher B. Granger, MD
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, NC


RELATED LETTER

Pexelizumab and the APEX AMI Trial--Reply
and
JAMA. ;297():1881-1882.
FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Pexelizumab for Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial

JAMA. ;297():43-51.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.