
Pexelizumab and the APEX AMI TrialReply
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply: The completion of the PRIMO-CABG II trial1-2 at a time when enrollment into the APEX AMI trial was still in progress enabled the steering committee and the trial sponsors to refine their estimates of the probability of detecting a clinically important benefit of pexelizumab on mortality. However, the reduction in sample size that occurred following their reassessment meant that the APEX AMI trial had only a 52% power to detect a 24% reduction in mortality at 30 days.
The APEX AMI investigators indicate that publication bias did not account for the apparent disagreement between the meta-analysis of phase 2 pexelizumab trials3 and the PRIMO-CABG II1-2 and APEX AMI trial results.4 Potential alternative explanations are that the pooled results of the phase 2 studies3 were inflated by the play of chance or that there is still a true benefit of pexelizumab to treat reperfusion injury. The latter explanation could . . . [Full Text of this Article]
John W. Eikelboom, MBBS
eikelbj@mcmaster.ca
Martin ODonnell, MB
McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED LETTER
Pexelizumab and the APEX AMI Trial
Paul W. Armstrong and Christopher B. Granger
JAMA. 2007;297(17):1881.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
Pexelizumab for Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The APEX AMI Investigators
JAMA. 2007;297(1):43-51.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|