This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Anesthesia  • Pain  • Alert me on articles by topic

Tracy Hampton, PhD

JAMA. 2007;297:2461-2462.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Better body armor and improved evacuations enable US soldiers in Iraq to survive blasts that would have proved fatal in previous conflicts. This creates a new challenge for military medicine: how to deal with the pain of injuries to extremities that body armor cannot protect (Gallagher RM and Polomano R. Pain Med. 2006;7:284-286).

Military researchers have found that regional anesthesia may be better than traditional general anesthesia for treating soldiers with acute injuries by helping prevent the development of chronic pain syndromes that can persist well after wounds have healed.

TREATING THE WAR'S WOUNDED

More than 18 000 soldiers deployed in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom have been wounded in combat, and medical advances have allowed military physicians to achieve a 90% survival rate among their wounded patients. "Obviously, that's going to cause consequences in their long-term outlooks that we’ve never had to deal with in previous conflicts because . . . [Full Text of this Article]